W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sysapps@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [runtime] Application Lifecycle and Events - F2F feedback incorporated

From: Jungkee Song <jungkees@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:46:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGwV++cSJgMoWZV10PgOfJ9qLj7Svkam9VOoa7c1ncHBpEvyMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>, "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>, "Christiansen, Kenneth R" <kenneth.r.christiansen@intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi <
anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:

> On Sep 17, 2013, at 1:51 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, September 16, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi wrote:
> >
> >> It'd be great if EventWorker would address say 90% of the requirements,
> and only minor extensions would be needed to support packaged apps.
> >
> > That would be great. I can't emphasize enough that there is an urgency
> for this group to get it's use cases and requirements in front of the folks
> currently working on Event Workers. Prototype implementations are happening
> right now in Chrome and Mozilla so we really don't want to miss the boat:
> the folks working on this change focus quickly (it was last week they were
> working on Promises, and next week they could switch to something else).
>
> On an initial scan the API proposal LGTM considering the needs of this
> group:
>
>
> https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/blob/master/service_worker.ts
>
> I'll be evaluating it in more detail against the use cases the group has
> identified.
>

Due to Thanksgiving holiday week this week in Korea, I couldn't review it
thoroughly, but after a quick scan it looks ServiceWorker covers quite the
same scope of the requirements and use cases. However, I reckon our focus
from SysApps point of view would be 1) the application model the group aims
to deliver - maybe specifying script for ServiceWorker in the standards
manifest ? 2) the ways to support the group's APIs atop ServiceWorker. I'll
try to dig into more detail next week.


>
> >>> Should we set up a call with them to discuss?
> >>
> >> That'd be great. Could you help set it up?
>
> > Not for a few weeks, sorry :(
>
> No problem. Actually, Kenneth will be at the Blink contributors conference
> next week. If Alex is there too I suggest the guys sync.
>
> > I suggest just pinging Alex on IRC - or just start bombarding the Event
> Worker's repository with questions/use cases. It might be worth while for
> us to request the TAG come and speak to the WG during TPAC. At least we can
> get Anne. Alex, and Yehuda in the room and ask them questions there.
>
>
> Having TAG around at TPAC would be very helpful indeed.
>

I agree. We need to inform Alex and Co. asap at least about the group's
proposal and the working model. And the discussion with TAG in the list and
TPAC would be of great help.



>
> Thanks,
>
> -Anssi
>



-- 

Jungkee Song
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2013 09:46:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:36:15 UTC