Re: [Alarm API] Use cases

On 12/02/2013 08:40 , Christophe Dumez - SISA wrote:
> The way I see it. The application that registered the alarm gets
> spawned if it is not currently running and the alarm goes off. Then,
> the "alarm" event is fired.

That does indeed seem like the desirable behaviour, but it would need to 
be specified. Maybe this needs to wait on the runtime document being 
sufficiently advanced that lifecycle requirements can be stated clearly?

> I - indeed - don't think we can currently
> schedule a notification. All we can do is have the application show
> the notification when the alarm event is fired.

I think it makes more sense to leave that up to the application indeed.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 08:53:10 UTC