public-sysapps@w3.org from February 2013 by author

Adam Barth

• Re: Stepping down as co-chair (Thursday, 28 February)
• Stepping down as co-chair (Thursday, 28 February)

Anders Rundgren

• Re: NFC web connection? (Thursday, 28 February)
• NFC web connection? (Tuesday, 26 February)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Thursday, 14 February)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Manifest format MIME type (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Manifest format MIME type (Tuesday, 26 February)

Brian LeRoux

• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository (Wednesday, 20 February)

Christophe Dumez

• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 (Friday, 1 February)

Christophe Dumez - SISA

• RE: [Alarm API] Use cases (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: Concerns about DOMRequest (Friday, 15 February)
• RE: [Alarm] respectTimezone (Friday, 15 February)
• RE: [Alarm API] Object data must be serialisable to JSON (Friday, 15 February)
• RE: [Alarm API] Object data must be serialisable to JSON (Friday, 15 February)
• RE: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: [Alarm API] Use cases (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: [Alarm] respectTimezone (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Affiliation change (Thursday, 7 February)

Dave Raggett

• Logistics for Madrid face to face and registration (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Web Alarms API is now a FPWD (Tuesday, 5 February)

David Bruant

• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 13 February)

EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA

• RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting (Friday, 1 February)

Fabrice Desre

• Re: Manifest format MIME type (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Tuesday, 26 February)

Filip Maj

• Re: The app: URI scheme (Monday, 18 February)

Janusz Majnert

• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Tuesday, 12 February)

John Lyle

• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Tuesday, 26 February)
• RE: The app: URI scheme (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Wednesday, 13 February)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Object data must be serialisable to JSON (Friday, 15 February)

Jungkee Song

• RE: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD (Wednesday, 20 February)
• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: [Alarm API] Use cases (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Wednesday, 6 February)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting (Monday, 4 February)

Kis, Zoltan

• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 (Friday, 1 February)

Lars Knudsen

• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model (Thursday, 21 February)
• question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model (Wednesday, 20 February)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: Stepping down as co-chair (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: .webapps file extension, was Re: Manifest format MIME type (Wednesday, 27 February)
• JSON encoding … Re: Manifest format MIME type (Tuesday, 26 February)
• .webapps file extension, was Re: Manifest format MIME type (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Manifest format MIME type (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Manifest format MIME type (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Manifest format MIME type (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model (Friday, 22 February)
• Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD (Thursday, 21 February)
• Supporting splash screens (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Tuesday, 19 February)
• The app: URI scheme (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Monday, 18 February)
• URI of a packaged file (Sunday, 17 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Waking the system up (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Waking the system up (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Edge Conference - Panel 6: Privileged access (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Tuesday, 12 February)
• [Alarm API] Object data must be serialisable to JSON (Monday, 11 February)
• [Alarm] respectTimezone (Monday, 11 February)
• [Alarm API] Use cases (Monday, 11 February)
• [Alarm API] Waking the system up (Monday, 11 February)
• [Alarm API] Privacy/control concerns (Monday, 11 February)

Ming Jin

• RE: The app: URI scheme (Wednesday, 27 February)
• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Thursday, 21 February)

Mounir Lamouri

• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD (Thursday, 28 February)
• Formal proposal regrading editorial process (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: .webapps file extension, was Re: Manifest format MIME type (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Monday, 25 February)
• Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: The app: URI scheme (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Saturday, 16 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Waking the system up (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Waking the system up (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Wednesday, 13 February)

Nilsson, Claes1

• RE: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Monday, 25 February)
• RE: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Sunday, 24 February)
• RE: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Thursday, 21 February)
• [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Monday, 18 February)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases (Tuesday, 12 February)

SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

• RE: Edge Conference - Panel 6: Privileged access (Friday, 15 February)

Suresh Chitturi

• RE: Contacts API (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Contacts API (Friday, 8 February)

Tomoyuki SHIMIZU

• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 (Friday, 1 February)

Wonsuk Lee

• Re: Contacts API (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Edge Conference - Panel 6: Privileged access (Thursday, 14 February)
• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Web Alarms API is now a FPWD (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting (Monday, 4 February)
• Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting (Monday, 4 February)
• Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting (Friday, 1 February)
• CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 (Friday, 1 February)
• RE: Contacts API (Friday, 1 February)

전종홍

• RE: NFC web connection? (Tuesday, 26 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2013 17:32:23 UTC