Toronto F2F, Telephony discussion

Hello,

There was a lot of work done on Telephony API, with a lot of open
issues. I would like to propose discussing/reviewing the following
issues in Telephony API:

- using system messages:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/14

- using constructors:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/17

- exposing protocol, format of service id's, telephony service object:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/125
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/53
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/137
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/203

- dealing with CDMA differences:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/204

- best practices: using arrays vs sequences (use case: a dynamic list
of a few changing objects, like telephony services, list of calls,
etc). Could a JS object be used to store the list so that property
name is the id and value is the object (removing/adding/changing
properties, each change signaled)?
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/81
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/194
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/200
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/201
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/133

-uncertainty because asynchronous operations:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/127
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/198
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/202

- printed diagrams don't fit:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/135

==============

- event for changed emergency numbers:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/36

- whether DTMF tone should be defined as ABNF
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/142

- call state management
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/166

- "tel://" URI
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/171

- editorials:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/174
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/175
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/192

- security related:
https://github.com/sysapps/telephony/issues/179

Some of these (above the divider) may be also applicable in other
specifications, such as system messages, best practices, using
services/protocols/service id's etc. These should be taken in common
discussion. The rest may not require everybody being present, so we
could handle them with the editors (only Marcos and me will be
present) + interested people, but we need to schedule that.

Best regards,
Zoltan

Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 13:08:09 UTC