W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > October 2005

[Fwd: ok if URIs for SPARQL interface etc. ends with paren? (serviceDescription)]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:36:24 -0500
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Message-Id: <1129138584.28805.657.camel@dirk>
I'd like some advice from this forum about whether I should
push harder on this aspect of WSDL 2.0.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

attached mail follows:



According to latest word from the WSDL WG, the (standard) URI for our
interface will be...
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#wsdl.interface(SparqlQuery)

i.e. something that can't be used as a qname in RDF/XML nor turtle.

Is that good enough? I need to say within the next week or so if not.


I can't think if any show-stopper reason why not, though it sure isn't pretty.

For details, the thread starts with
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Sep/0009
and culminates with
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Oct/0013


This is mostly related to serviceDescription, which we've
postponed.
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#serviceDescription

But by the time we (or somebody like us) pick it up, it'll
be too late to give technical input on WSDL 2.0.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2005 17:36:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:11:02 GMT