- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:52:47 -0500
- To: drew.mcdermott@yale.edu
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
On Nov 25, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Drew McDermott wrote: >> [Shi, Xuan] >> >> But where are your viewpoints and suggestions to my discussion in >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sws-ig/2005Nov/0089.html > > I think your proposals make perfect sense. You want to replace WSDL > descriptions with descriptions of web services with standard names and > standard argument-result protocols. [snip] Er...can't you do that *with* WSDL? WSDL describes service names and argument results protocols. The abstract description can be bound to many protocols and wire formats and be realized by many endpoints. So, er...what's the diff? Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 25 November 2005 21:52:59 UTC