W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > November 2005

Re: Where are the semantics in the semantic Web?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:52:47 -0500
Message-Id: <9da2404c8e6b1623f96a7376f8197a32@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
To: drew.mcdermott@yale.edu

On Nov 25, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Drew McDermott wrote:

>> [Shi, Xuan]
>>
>> But where are your viewpoints and suggestions to my discussion in
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sws-ig/2005Nov/0089.html
>
> I think your proposals make perfect sense.  You want to replace WSDL
> descriptions with descriptions of web services with standard names and
> standard argument-result protocols.
[snip]
Er...can't you do that *with* WSDL? WSDL describes service names and 
argument results protocols. The abstract description can be bound to 
many protocols and wire formats and be realized by many endpoints.

So, er...what's the diff?

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 25 November 2005 21:52:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:11:02 GMT