W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > November 2005

RE: Where are the semantics in the semantic Web?

From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:34:35 -0500
Message-ID: <17287.30043.15620.721969@DVM-Powerbook.local>
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org


> [Shi, Xuan]
> 
> But where are your viewpoints and suggestions to my discussion in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sws-ig/2005Nov/0089.html

I think your proposals make perfect sense.  You want to replace WSDL
descriptions with descriptions of web services with standard names and
standard argument-result protocols. But then you then went on to argue
that anyone who wants to explore levels "above" or "below" yours is
misguided. "Below" means sticking with the WSDL framework; "above"
means standardizing on a declarative vocabulary that would allow
descriptions of the expected effects of invoking a web
service. "Below" is no good because it doesn't even try to say what a
web service does; "above" is no good because it's impossible to
standardize declarative vocabularies -- their semantics is too
complex.

You may be right about the appropriate level to standardize on, but I
don't see how we can settle the matter a priori.

-- 

                                         -- Drew McDermott
                                            Yale University
                                            Computer Science Department
Received on Friday, 25 November 2005 20:33:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:11:02 GMT