W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > November 2005

RE: [fwd] Draft charters for work on Semantics for WS

From: Battle, Steven Andrew <steve.battle@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:47:25 -0000
Message-ID: <DE62D3D0BDEF184FBB5089C7D387C37449B4ED@sdcexc04.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Cc: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>, "Carine Bournez" <carine@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Prud'hommeaux [mailto:eric@w3.org] 
> Sent: 17 November 2005 11:17
> To: Battle, Steven Andrew
> Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [fwd] Draft charters for work on Semantics for WS
> 
...
> 
> The OWL-S Submission adds the following WSDL markup:
...
> The WSDL-S Submission adds the following WSDL markup:
...

> I *think* that the momentum is behind adding modelReferences 
> to WSDL components. The charter is a test of that hypothesis.

The scope of the proposed working group is clear:

"The Semantic Annotations for WSDL Working Group is chartered to define
such an extension that allows expression of the semantics of WSDL 2.0
components."

Both the OWL-S and WSDL-S submissions contribute work that is in scope.
The charter should not pre-judge  the process or its outcome, otherwise
there would be little point in participating.

Steve Battle (Hewlett-Packard)
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2005 12:47:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:11:02 GMT