W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > January 2005

Re: Documentation for the surface sintax

From: David Martin <martin@AI.SRI.COM>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:19:39 -0800
Message-ID: <41EEB2CB.7070905@ai.sri.com>
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, Tatiana Vieira <tascvieira@yahoo.com.br>

Two other references that are relevant to this thread:

Concurrent Execution Semantics for DAML-S with Subtypes, Anupriya 
Ankolekar, Frank Huch, Katia Sycara, The First International Semantic 
Web Conference (ISWC), Sardinia (Italy), June, 2002. (pdf)

Narayanan, S. and McIlraith, S., "Simulation, Verification and Automated 
Composition of Web Services", Proceedings of the Eleventh International 
World Wide Web Conference (WWW-11), Honolulu, Hawaii, May, 2002.

These are both available here:

http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/pub-archive.html

(Note that a number of the papers in this publication archive, including 
these two, have been written by members of the OWL-S Coalition, but do 
not necessarily represent joint work of the entire coalition.)

Regards,
David

Bijan Parsia wrote:

> 
> On Jan 19, 2005, at 8:25 AM, Tatiana Vieira wrote:
> 
>> Hi people,
>>  
>> I found some message in this list about a surface sintax that I didn't 
>> known about. Could anyone give me some start point about it, or some 
>> link that contains a basic documentation?
> 
> 
> For OWL-S 1.1, see:
>     http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/owl-s-gram.pdf
> 
> You also might look in the archives for this mailing list, where Drew 
> sends updates.
> 
>> In addition, does OWL-S has a formal semantic descritpion?
> 
> 
> Aside from the encoding in OWL, not really. At least, not from this 
> group as a group.
> 
> There are several semantics (sitcalc, petri net, "execution") out there 
> for various fragments of the control structures of the process model 
> (and probably a bit more). Evren Sirin has done some work integrating 
> SWRL atom style preconditons and effects with SHOP2, from there, you 
> could bootstrap a formal semantics that would cover an interesting 
> fragrment of OWL-S (right now, for Ijcai, we're working on description 
> based method and operator selection in SHOP...that may or may not be 
> suitably formal for you; we intend, at some point, to expand our mapping 
> to Golog/sitcalc to encompass these bits).
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan Parsia.
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:18:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:59 GMT