W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > October 2004

RE: ambiguous match and business transaction

From: <sam.watkins@bt.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:23:44 +0100
Message-ID: <21DA6754A9238B48B92F39637EF307FD0A27DF7F@i2km41-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
If we have "service insurance" as described by Joe, 
"I see you did not receive a response on the above point yet: What this
comes down to is electronic trust, and potentially SLAs (service-level
agreements). For example, Web Service A is provided by a service
provider (that we will call Service Provider A). The service consumer
would need to have an SLA with Service Provider A that makes Service
Provider A responsible for the authenticity and non-harmful nature of
Web Service A. 

 

What is missing in this is something that I foresee a need for in the
future - and that is some type of insurance policy (call it "service
insurance") by which a service provider can be held liable for damages
by a service that they offer (whether the damages be theft of personal
information as you describe above, or interruption to business
operations if a service is down for longer than the agreed-upon
permissible time, etc.). A service consumer would then be entitled to
some monetary award by filing a claim with the service insurance
provider. This is an incentive for a service provider to ensure the
authenticity, non-harmfulness, and dependability of their services. I
foresee the existence of this new type of insurance provider within the
next 10 years.  

 

An e-business registry - such as UDDI or ebXML Registry - might also be
involved here. In this case, the service consumer would have an SLA with
the registry provider, who vouches for the authenticity,
non-harmfulness, and dependability of the services within its registry."

 
However, as with any business transaction, I protect myself by using
trust worthy suppliers so will not require such insurance.  I do not
trust businesses until I have established trust.
 
As such, I would not insure myself against this loss as an individual.
As a supplier I would aim to only deal with companies I knew and trusted
- and I certainly would not request or pass on credit card details
unless I were using them.  So again I would not buy such insurance.
 
Anyway, with a credit card, I would expect that any fraud of this kind
would be covered by the credit cards insurance...
regards,
Sam J Watkins

------------------------------------------------------------------
Next Generation Web Research, BT
Tel: +44(0) 1473 609636

----------------------------------------------------------------------
British Telecommunications plc
Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
Registered in England no. 1800000

This electronic message contains information from British
Telecommunications plc which may be privileged and confidential. The
information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message
in error, please notify us by telephone or email (to the number or
address above) immediately. Activity and use of the British
Telecommunications plc email system is monitored to secure its effective
operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using
this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. 

 
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 11:23:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:58 GMT