W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > November 2004

Re: OWL-S version 1.1 now available

From: Daniel Elenius <daele@ida.liu.se>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:14:37 -0800
Message-ID: <419E7E5D.7090800@ida.liu.se>
To: Ian Dickinson <ian.dickinson@hp.com>, public-sws-ig@w3.org

> * also in section 5.4, there seems to be no syntactic difference 
> between ControlConstructBag and ControlConstructList, so why not just 
> make one a sub-class of the other?
But there is a *semantic* difference, i.e. the bag should not be 
interpreted as ordered. Although, I don't see what difference it would 
make, since any OWL-S reasoner would base its reasoning on the kind of 
control construct that the bag or list belongs to anyway. For example, 
if you have a Split, you already know that the ordering of the 
components do not matter, and in a Sequende you know that it does 
matter. Then again, it doesn't really hurt to have the two classes, I think.

I guess I agree with everything else.

Received on Friday, 19 November 2004 23:15:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:13 UTC