Re: OWL-S version 1.1 now available

> * also in section 5.4, there seems to be no syntactic difference 
> between ControlConstructBag and ControlConstructList, so why not just 
> make one a sub-class of the other?
>
But there is a *semantic* difference, i.e. the bag should not be 
interpreted as ordered. Although, I don't see what difference it would 
make, since any OWL-S reasoner would base its reasoning on the kind of 
control construct that the bag or list belongs to anyway. For example, 
if you have a Split, you already know that the ordering of the 
components do not matter, and in a Sequende you know that it does 
matter. Then again, it doesn't really hurt to have the two classes, I think.

I guess I agree with everything else.

/Daniel