W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > June 2004

Re: OWL-S process preconditions

From: <domurtag@tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:44:17 +0100
Message-ID: <1087649057.40d43521bedf6@mymail.tcd.ie>
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org



[snip]
>> OK, so a precondition should be expressed as a conjunction of SWRL
>> atoms,
>> rather than a SWRL rule (with an antecedent and consequent). By the
>> way, are
>> there any examples available of SWRL being used to express process
>> preconditions (or indeed any other OWL-S conditional expressions).
>
> I believe the standard examples are being augmented with example
> preconditions, etc. Our lab should have some of the standard planning
> domains ported to OWL-S by release time.


What exactly do you mean by the "standard" examples, those on daml.org, or
mindswap.org?
Also, what are the standard planning domains?

Thanks,
Dónal
Received on Saturday, 19 June 2004 08:50:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:13 UTC