W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > June 2004

Re: OWL-S process preconditions

From: <domurtag@tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:44:17 +0100
Message-ID: <1087649057.40d43521bedf6@mymail.tcd.ie>
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org

>> OK, so a precondition should be expressed as a conjunction of SWRL
>> atoms,
>> rather than a SWRL rule (with an antecedent and consequent). By the
>> way, are
>> there any examples available of SWRL being used to express process
>> preconditions (or indeed any other OWL-S conditional expressions).
> I believe the standard examples are being augmented with example
> preconditions, etc. Our lab should have some of the standard planning
> domains ported to OWL-S by release time.

What exactly do you mean by the "standard" examples, those on daml.org, or
Also, what are the standard planning domains?

Received on Saturday, 19 June 2004 08:50:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:13 UTC