Re: OWL-S process preconditions

[snip]
>> OK, so a precondition should be expressed as a conjunction of SWRL
>> atoms,
>> rather than a SWRL rule (with an antecedent and consequent). By the
>> way, are
>> there any examples available of SWRL being used to express process
>> preconditions (or indeed any other OWL-S conditional expressions).
>
> I believe the standard examples are being augmented with example
> preconditions, etc. Our lab should have some of the standard planning
> domains ported to OWL-S by release time.


What exactly do you mean by the "standard" examples, those on daml.org, or
mindswap.org?
Also, what are the standard planning domains?

Thanks,
Dónal

Received on Saturday, 19 June 2004 08:44:08 UTC