W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > December 2004

Re: OWL-S 1.1 has_process parameter

From: David Martin <martin@AI.SRI.COM>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 23:56:58 -0800
Message-ID: <41B410CA.5020001@ai.sri.com>
To: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
CC: public-sws-ig@w3.org

Drew McDermott wrote:

>>[Quoth Ben Fries <Develin@gmx.de>]
>>Being rather new to OWL and OWL-S I noticed that the has_process 
>>parameter is the only of these "has" parameter written this way 
>>(underscore between both words and the entire name in lower case) while 
>>all other parameters  (hasInput etc) use a different way.
>>It caught me by surprise so I wondered if this intentional or just an 
> Where did you see it?

It's defined in Profile.owl.

And the answer to Ben's question is that it was just an accident.  Maybe 
we should correct in in the next release, with hasProcess.  has_process 
can remain as a deprecated property name for backwards compatibility.

Received on Monday, 6 December 2004 07:57:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:54:14 UTC