W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > December 2004

Re: OWL-S 1.1 has_process parameter

From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 01:14:11 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <E1Cb7Sh-0005xE-HC@frink.w3.org>


> [Quoth Ben Fries <Develin@gmx.de>]

> Being rather new to OWL and OWL-S I noticed that the has_process 
> parameter is the only of these "has" parameter written this way 
> (underscore between both words and the entire name in lower case) while 
> all other parameters  (hasInput etc) use a different way.
> 
> It caught me by surprise so I wondered if this intentional or just an 
> accident?

Where did you see it?

-- 

                                         -- Drew McDermott
                                            Yale University
                                            Computer Science Department

Some see the glass as half empty, some as half full.  Surely the
truth lies somewhere in between.
Received on Monday, 6 December 2004 01:14:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:59 GMT