W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > December 2003

Re: UDDI and semantics: CMU OWL-S/UDDI Mapping

From: Drew McDermott <drew.mcdermott@yale.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:10:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200312041710.hB4HALL21094@pantheon-po02.its.yale.edu>
To: jeff@polexis.com
Cc: UCorda@SeeBeyond.com, public-sws-ig@w3.org


   X-Original-To: public-sws-ig@frink.w3.org
   X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
   content-class: urn:content-classes:message
   Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	   boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3B9CA.5941E096"
   Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:22:02 -0800
   X-MS-Has-Attach: 
   X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <1DB6146221612E44BC62157D102A222F0102467F@polexis-vat.polexis.com>
   Thread-Topic: Re: UDDI and semantics: CMU OWL-S/UDDI Mapping
   Thread-Index: AcO5Qi//fpNrWTHrRxSB3hd3kFk7kgAhbSVK
   X-PH: V4.4@mr3
   From: "Jeff Lansing" <jeff@polexis.com>
   X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/1DB6146221612E44BC62157D102A222F0102467F@polexis-vat.polexis.com
   Resent-From: public-sws-ig@w3.org
   X-Mailing-List: <public-sws-ig@w3.org> archive/latest/110
   X-Loop: public-sws-ig@w3.org
   Sender: public-sws-ig-request@w3.org
   Resent-Sender: public-sws-ig-request@w3.org
   X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.1d (attachment(s) not renamed)


   This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

   ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3B9CA.5941E096
   Content-Type: text/plain;
	   charset="UTF-8"
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
   X-Former-Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

   One semantic addition to UDDI that I can think of (but I don't yet see
   how to really make it work) would be to provide the ability to describe
   the semantics of the associations that are created by adding categories
   to a service. 

   In a bit more detail: 
   I have a taxonomy of things registered in UDDI, and I have a service.
   I register my service, adding a category from my taxonomy to the service
   (to its category bag).
   This creates an association between my service, and a category of my
   taxonomy.
   But what association is that? Is it an ISA link? Is it "is instance of"?
   "Is it "is provider of"?
   It would be nice to know.

I pick "is provider of," or just "provides."

-- 
                                             -- Drew McDermott
                                                Yale University CS Dept.
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2003 12:10:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 16 March 2008 00:10:53 GMT