[moving this into my work mailbox...] Nice one, thanks Danny. > [cc'ing sweo] > > Hi Tom, > > I suspect it might be easiest for me to manually add the list > of resources on the Wiki: > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/RecommendedTutor ials > what do you reckon? I think that would be a real shame... > - but following your suggestion of putting stuff in RDF for more direct import, > I've had a quick play with aggregating data from del.icio.us with an appropriate > combination of tags ("tutorial"+"rdf" > etc) and sanitising it. (The raw RSS/RDF from del.icio.us makes the tagger the > dc:creator of the resource, I think there were other questionable statements...). > Under http://n2.talis.com/svn/playground/danja/python/sweo-tutorials/ > you will find: > delicious-source.py > - quick and dirty RDF accumulator > delicious.rdf > - what a trial run aggregated > delicious.sparql > - to grab the bits of interest > delicious-sweo.n3 > - the result > I used rdflib to accumulate the stuff, but that doesn't yet support SPARQL > CONSTRUCT (hint hint Ivan!) so I used ARQ for that. > rdflib also seems to have done something strange with the taggings in the source > data (which uses taxo:), to the extent I couldn't easily swap these over to the > tag ontology - so I hard-coded a couple of taggings for all items. Ok, excellent, I'll have a look at your output. > btw, might just have been me, but when I checked the RDF for a recent post at > revyu.com I only found some garbled stuff. Ah, ok, thanks. I'll investigate... More soon, Cheers, Tom.Received on Thursday, 11 October 2007 15:16:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:40 GMT