W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sweo-ig@w3.org > March 2007

Re: SWEO promotion material

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:00:39 +0100
Message-ID: <45F91947.5090804@w3.org>
To: Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@gmail.com>
Cc: Dunja Ewinger <de@webxcerpt.com>, W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Susie, Dunja,

let me reiterate that the text should be sent to the Comm team, too,
before finalizing it.

B.t.w.: Dunja, is there any problem (legal or otherwise) if these flyers
are taken up by W3C (SWEO, the comm team, etc) as general SW Flyers, and
not only for the purpose of this specific conference?

Ivan

Susie Stephens wrote:
> Hi Dunja,
>  
> I think your plans sounds excellent. I look forward to hearing what you
> think about possibly simplifying the layout for the overview.
>  
> Lets discuss during next week's call which use cases/case
> studies/community projects we'd like to include in the conference pack.
>  
> Ivan will need to respond to your question about money.
>  
> Cheers,
>  
> Susie
>  
> 
> 
>  
> On 3/14/07, *Dunja Ewinger* <de@webxcerpt.com <mailto:de@webxcerpt.com>>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Hi Susie,
> 
>     to see what format I was talking about please find attached the Semantic
>     Web Days Flyer (Flyer_swd.pdf).
> 
>     My idea is to create a generell Semantic Web flyer in this format. It
>     would consist of the (current version of the) SWEO Logo, maybe the W3C
>     Logo would be good as well, a slogan (that would probably needs to be
>     discussed...), maybe the layer cake, a nice "eye catcher" (e.g.image),
>     and generell information on SW (introduction, categories, application
>     areas, FAQ...)
> 
>     I will put together the material and give it to the designer, so she
>     can
>     start. A very first draft (pdf) will be then sent around by latest
>     Thursday next week, maybe on time for the telcon on Wednesday.
>     Within the 3 weeks I'm in holiday the SWEO group should discuss the
>     flyer in terms of:
> 
>     the slogan
>     the logo
>     Is the information in the correct order?
>     What should be the core messages?
>     Is something missing?
>     Is the text correct?
>     etc.
> 
>     So by the time I return the designer can continue to work on the flyer
>     with all the input from SWEO. In this way it should be not a problem to
>     have the flyer ready for the ESTC.
> 
>     I agree with the idea to present use cases or case studies. But of
>     course one would need to select a few from the current list. How do we
>     decide which use case we should take?
> 
>     One idea that came up during the telcon was to describe the common
>     projects. It would be good to make a generell decision: shall we present
>     "solutions" or shall we describe most promising projects but without
>     solutions yet?
> 
>     Another question is how we should present either the use cases or the
>     projects. In full text or in a table? I found an example for the table
>     format that could be feasible:
> 
>     W3C SWAD
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/chosen_demos_rationale_report/hp-applications-survey.html#Database%20integration%20example
>     <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/chosen_demos_rationale_report/hp-applications-survey.html#Database%20integration%20example>
> 
> 
>     I asked the designer to think about possible presentation formats for
>     the use cases (series of papers, a booklet...). Maybe we can discuss
>     that during the next telcon.
> 
>     Regarding the finances: is there any money in W3C/SWEO that could be
>     spent on the promotion material? REWERSE could of course pay a part of
>     the costs but since we are an EU project we have limited financial
>     resources... An idea could be that REWERSE pays the cost for the design
>     and W3C for the print.
> 
>     What do you think?
> 
>     Kind regards,
>     Dunja
> 
>     --
>     Dunja Ewinger
>     Technology Transfer & Awareness
>     EU-network of Excellence REWERSE
>     http://rewerse.net <http://rewerse.net>
>     Tel.: +49 89 548 088 48
>     Email: de@webXcerpt.com <mailto:de@webXcerpt.com>
>     REWERSE is member of the W3C SWEO Interest Group
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/ <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

- --

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF+RlHdR3hQzQ/Gj0RAj9gAKC8tLEeiYZkX+GxIVpb72sI1HOtAwCfXZmJ
sltuys8JpaWwSqbB23RlW9U=
=cJSx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 10:02:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:52 UTC