- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:09:29 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: Danny Ayers <Danny.Ayers@talis.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>, W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Danny Ayers wrote: >> I am not convinced that Longwell will deliver the ease of production you >> espouse re. this portal effort. That said, I am extremely willing to be >> convinced otherwise, by seeing it accelerate the portal effort :-) > > Would I be right in thinking there's already a pile of data gathered? > (Sorry, not been following very well). If so, if you can point me to > an RDF/XML dump, I can have a play with Longwell on it, see what it > looks like... > > Cheers, > Danny. Danny, See: 1. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/public/Info/ (main page) 2. http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/WishList Which will reveal: 1. SPARQL Endpoint 2. iSPARQL QBE Endpoint 3. Sample Queries for Listing Graphs (in Dynamic Linked Data Page and SPARQL Query Definition forms) Note: The server will protect itself from a CONTRUCT aimed at dumping the entire Data Store via SPARQL. The plan was to produce a separate RDF Archive for al the contents of this store (as per "Open Data" best practices). -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Sunday, 22 July 2007 14:13:00 UTC