W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: some thoughts about the OWL WG comments

From: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:45:28 +0100
To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20081010114528.GD6803@skiathos>

Hi Guus,

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 04:03:19PM +0200, Guus Schreiber wrote:
> NOTATIONS
>
> [[
>   The OWL WG notes that one portion of SKOS (Notations) uses custom
> datatypes.  Although these seem to be benign, because RDF and OWL allow
> extra datatypes, the use of these datatypes is not likely to be
> supported by many tools.  The presence of extra datatypes may cause
> difficulties in some tools, which may just reject SKOS documents that
> have these datatypes.
> ]]
>
> Sean already pointed out that we can indicate in the document that  
> user-defined datatypes are only explicitly needed when one needs  
> multiple notations (so only in Sec. ). In addition I would like to add  
> the tools should not reject SKOS documents containing user-defined  
> datatypes, see the OWL reference section on datatype reasoning [2], in  
> particular the last sentence:
>
> [[
>   Unrecognized datatypes should be treated in the same way as  
> unsupported datatypes.
> ]]

This approach seems sound to me.

Cheers,

Alistair.

-- 
Alistair Miles
Senior Computing Officer
Image Bioinformatics Research Group
Department of Zoology
The Tinbergen Building
University of Oxford
South Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PS
United Kingdom
Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993
Received on Friday, 10 October 2008 11:46:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 October 2008 11:46:05 GMT