ISSUE-99: Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example mistaken in Section 5.3

ISSUE-99: Last Call Comment: Editorial Bug in @src example mistaken in Section 5.3

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/99

Raised by: Ben Adida
On product: RDFa

raised by Micah Dubinko in [1].

"""
If I am reading the 21 Feb spec correctly, @src now can stand in for the 
subject of a triple in the absence of @about. Can somebody set me 
straight on how this squares with the leading example in section 5.3?

<div about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Albert_Einstein">
  <span property="foaf:name">Albert Einstein</span>
  <span property="dbp:dateOfBirth" datatype="xsd:date">1879-03-14</span>
  <div rel="dbp:birthPlace" resource="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Germany">
    <span property="dbp:conventionalLongName">Federal Republic of Germany</span>
  </div>
  <img rel="foaf:depiction"
src="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg" />
</div>


In particular, how does foaf:depiction fit in here? Given the image 
resource as a subject, shouldn't it use foaf:depicts?
"""

Probably Resolution: this is an editorial bug in section 5.3 where the usage of
@src hasn't been updated to the latest spec. Updating the example to bring the
@rel up one level is the way to fix this.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0114.html

Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 01:30:07 UTC