W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > June 2008

RE: ISSUE-72: ExactMatchTransitive

From: Sini, Margherita (KCEW) <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:23:39 +0200
To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB66903F84D3B@hqgiex01.fao.org>

I believe yes.

Regards
Margherita

-----Original Message-----
From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of SWD Issue Tracker
Sent: 16 January 2008 21:54
To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-72: ExactMatchTransitive




ISSUE-72: ExactMatchTransitive

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/72

Raised by: Alistair Miles
On product: SKOS

Currently, skos:exactMatch is not defined as a transitive property. However,
it would seem reasonable and useful to define skos:exactMatch as transitive,
which would mean e.g. that the graph:

<A> skos:exactMatch <B>.
<B> skos:exactMatch <C>.

... would entail:

<A> skos:exactMatch <C>.

Should skos:exactMatch be transitive?
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 15:24:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:53 UTC