Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > I was the only person on both the last RDFa and SWD calls, My apologies, I meant to attend, but I lost track of time because I'm at a conference. > a) this is a procedural misunderstanding on Ben's part It may well be, but if we don't need a review, then our schedule will be easier. > b) whether the concerns as to whether Alan's issue (122) is editorial or substantive requires WG review to approve TF judgment that this is editorial. > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/122 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0080 I'm about to send an email with my evaluation of Alan's issue. High-order bit: nothing substantive, but possibly some non-negligible editorial work. -BenReceived on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 17:05:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 July 2008 17:05:05 GMT