Re: RDFa/SWD (mis)coordination

Ben Adida wrote:
> 
> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>>
>> I was the only person on both the last RDFa and SWD calls,
> 
> My apologies, I meant to attend, but I lost track of time because I'm at 
> a conference.
> 
>> a) this is a procedural misunderstanding on Ben's part
> 
> It may well be, but if we don't need a review, then our schedule will be 
> easier.
> 
>> b) whether the concerns as to whether Alan's issue (122) is editorial 
>> or substantive requires WG review to approve TF judgment that this is 
>> editorial.
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/122
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0080
> 
> I'm about to send an email with my evaluation of Alan's issue. 
> High-order bit: nothing substantive, but possibly some non-negligible 
> editorial work.

As long as it is editorial there should be no problem. I would expect 
the WG to ask the reviewers to do a quick check of the edits.

So we keep to the schedule of taking a PR request decsion on 19 Aug, I 
guess.

Guus
> 
> -Ben
>