W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: RDFa Implementation Report and Reviewed Editors' Draft

From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:51:52 -0400
Message-ID: <f032cc060808260051l368ca6a7lfaac9cc814763cc0@mail.gmail.com>
To: "SWD Working Group" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Ben, here's my brief review of the editorial changes to the RDFa in
XHTML [1] and also some brief notes on the Primer [2].



Section 2.

- is the last example missing the dc namespace declaration? Just FYI
this example doesn't work properly with the dev version of the rdfa
highlighter bookmarklet [3] ; but it seems fine in the latest stable
version [4].

Appendix A.

- extra "by" in "It is implemented by by"

RDFa Primer

- I noticed you added an Abstract overview, which is nice. It got me
wondering a bit why no mention of Microformats is made in the Primer.
I'm guessing this was intentional, but I think some text in the Primer
might help people understand RDFa's relation to Microformats. Maybe a
precis of Manu's Thought's on HTML5, RDFa and Microformats [5]. Or is
the inappropriate for the Primer?

- I like the new text about XHTML and HTML4.


[1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080814/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080813/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/
[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/20070301/
[5] http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/08/23/html5-rdfa-and-microformats/
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2008 07:52:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:54 UTC