RE: [SKOS] Amsterdam topic: "Label relations"

Hi all,

I've written up some discussion for input to the "Label Relations" topic at the f2f at:

<http://purl.org/net/skos/2007/10/f2f/label-relations.html>

This document illustrates the two possible variants of Guus' "Simple Extension" proposal, and discusses the consequences of each. 

ACTION: Alistair to state the difference between the two flavours of the SimpleExtension proposal for issue 26 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-swd-minutes.html#action05]
--done

Sorry it took so long :)

Cheers,

Alistair.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Baker
> Sent: 15 September 2007 15:30
> To: SWD Working Group
> Subject: [SKOS] Amsterdam topic: "Label relations"
> 
> 
> This week's agenda includes an excerpt from the Amsterdam 
> agenda for the topic 
> 
>     Label relations (discussion leader: Guus)
> 
> I suggest we try to agree on the call about the scope and 
> reading list for this topic.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
> > Amsterdam agenda topic: "Label relations" (Guus)
> > -- Issue-26: RelationshipsBetweenLabels 
> > (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26)
> > 
> > ACTION: Guus to move ISSUE-26 forward [recorded in 
> > http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action04]
> > 
> > ACTION: Guus to post user experience reports for ISSUE-26 
> [recorded in 
> > http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action05]
> > 
> > ACTION: Alistair to state the difference between the two 
> flavours of 
> > the SimpleExtension proposal for issue 26 [recorded in 
> > http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-swd-minutes.html#action05]
> > 
> > For discussion on the telecon, from
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda#LabelRelations:
> > 
> > >   Relevant issue:
> > >    * [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26 '''Issue-26 - 
> > >      RelationshipsBetweenLabels''' (open)]
> > >    * Issue: SKOS allows to represent semantic relationships
> > >      (broader, related) between concepts. It also allows
> > >      to represent relationships between concepts and labels
> > >      (prefLabel, altLabel). However, there is nothing proposed
> > >      in SKOS to capture links between labels themselves, a
> > >      configuration which sometimes happens in concept schemes.
> > >
> > >   Required background reading:
> > >    * 
> [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBe
> tweenLabels/ 
> > >      SkosDesign RelationshipsBetweenLabels]
> > >
> > >   Three options will be discussed in Amsterdam
> > >    * 
> [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBe
> tweenLabels/ProposalFour 
> > >      Alistair's "Minimal Label Relation" proposal]
> > >    * 
> [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBe
> tweenLabels/ProposalThree 
> > >      Guus "Simple Extension" proposal]
> > >    * 
> [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Sep/001
> 3.html Guus "remove range 
> > >      restriction for skos: prefLabel" proposal]
> 
> --
> Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 11:11:48 UTC