W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > March 2007

RE: [SKOS] requirement for multimedia annotations

From: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:27:25 -0700
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20070321212622.0488e950@med.stanford.edu>
To: "Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Cc: <public-esw-thes@w3.org>

Hi Alistair,
That's ok, I have a very good biomedical use case for using images to 
annotate concepts! We can discuss when appropriate.
Daniel

At 04:19 AM 3/21/2007, Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) wrote:
>Hi Daniel,
>
>Actually I meant using multimedia objects to annotate concepts, rather
>than the other way around.
>
>Sorry, reading my email again, it's pretty ambiguous. Which is not to
>say that use cases for annotating images and image regions aren't
>equally important :)
>
>Cheers,
>
>Alistair.
>
>--
>Alistair Miles
>Research Associate
>CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
>Building R1 Room 1.60
>Fermi Avenue
>Chilton
>Didcot
>Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
>United Kingdom
>Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
>Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
>Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Rubin [mailto:rubin@med.stanford.edu]
> > Sent: 21 March 2007 03:05
> > To: Miles, AJ (Alistair); SWD WG
> > Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: [SKOS] requirement for multimedia annotations
> >
> > Alistair,
> > Actually, I have a use case related to the need to annotate entire
> > images and image regions using terminologies.
> > Daniel
> >
> > At 05:49 AM 3/20/2007, Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) wrote:
> >
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >I've been thinking for a while that SKOS ought to provide flexible
> > >support for annotations with arbitrary multimedia content,
> > but I haven't
> > >had time to develop a suitable use case. However, I just noticed that
> > >the W3C glossaries in RDF (which use SKOS) require support
> > for fragments
> > >of HTML as the content of annotations:
> > >
> > >http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/data/glossaries/hy
> > pertext-ter
> > >ms.rdf
> > >http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/data/glossaries/
> > >
> > >The W3C glossaries use case only requires HTML annotation content
> > >("application/xhtml+xml"), but SKOS ought to support arbitrary MIME
> > >types.
> > >
> > >Does anyone else have potential use cases requiring annotations with
> > >multimedia content - text, HTML fragments, SSML, MathML,
> > images, video,
> > >audio ... ? I'd like to see this become a requirement for SKOS, so a
> > >concrete use case (in addition to W3C glossaries) would be really
> > >helpful. Otherwise I'll try to invent something plausible.
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >
> > >Alistair.
> > >
> > >--
> > >Alistair Miles
> > >Research Associate
> > >CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> > >Building R1 Room 1.60
> > >Fermi Avenue
> > >Chilton
> > >Didcot
> > >Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
> > >United Kingdom
> > >Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
> > >Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
> > >Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
> >
> >
> >
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 16:01:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:49 UTC