At 11:10 AM 2/27/2007 -0500, Jon Phipps wrote: >This looks fine to me. Very helpful Thanks Ralph. > >On 2/27/07, Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org> wrote: >> >> ACTION: Ralph write a proposal for bringing http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess and Tracker into alignment [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-swd-minutes.html#action15] [see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Feb/0201.html ] >>If this seems reasonable, I am willing to revise IssuesProcess >>accordingly. Having seen support from Guus, Jon, Alistair, and Tom, I have now updated the Wiki page [1] describing our Process for Issues Lists. [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess The only change I made that we did not discuss explicitly is in the end of section 1.3 where I changed the emphasis to discourage multiple issues in a single email rather than permitting it.Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2007 14:32:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:28 GMT