- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:03:34 +0200
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi Guus, This is strange, I had understood that using skos:Label was confusing with other labelling properties (like rdfs:label that would be applied to instances of such a class) Anyway I personally prefer this, if people can leave with it. So to me, yes, it is a step forward! One thing I'm less confortable with is this <x>LabelR. Do you think this is less confusing than using <x>LabelResource? Cheers, Antoine > >> ACTION: Guus to update proposal with issue of single vs. multiple >> labels for terms [recorded in >> http://www.w3.org/2007/06/12-swd-minutes.html#action09] > > I have updated the proposal accordingly. In addition, I have changed > the naming of skos:Term to skos:Label and the corresponding properties > to <x>LabelR. See the Wiki page for details [1]. I hope this is a step > forward. > > Guus > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels/ProposalThree >
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 17:43:38 UTC