- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:15:31 +0200
- To: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- CC: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tom, The requirement URIs are now on the wiki, at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCRMaterial/RequirementUris Is it OK? Antoine > Antoine, > > In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0009.html: > >>>> Here is the full set of IDs (below). ... >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-ConceptualRelations >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-ConceptSchemeExtension >>>> > > You wrote: > >> About the action: >> >> >>> ACTION: Alistair to fix wording on skos issues sandbox [recorded in >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-minutes.html#action03] >>> >> I propose the following strategy: >> >> 1. When there is an existing requirement corresponding to the issue, we >> follow the label which was given in the Use case document [1] >> > > I suggest we put a full set of URIs for Requirements onto > one of the relevant wiki pages and make sure the other SKOS > pages all point to it. That way, we can also all get into > the habit of citing them in mailing-list postings. > > Tom > >
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 16:15:47 UTC