W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > January 2007

Re: [RDFa] Re: Commenst on use cases #2 - #7 [Re: an update of the use case document]

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:21:31 +0100
Message-ID: <45BF7E9B.8020507@w3.org>
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Great. Don't forget to add a reference to GRDDL

I.

Ben Adida wrote:
> 
> Ivan,
> 
> I've applied changes according to your comments below, and the result is
> now live at:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/
> 
> (soon to be snapshot for the WG.)
> 
> Ivan Herman wrote:
> 
>>Use case #2
>>
>>Last paragraph: "the structured data contains the complete iCal and
>>Dublin Core metadata" (the DC is missing). As the issue is the easy mix
>>of vocabularies, this is good to be emphasized
> 
> 
> I wanted to emphasize iCal separately, but I've added something to point
> out DC, too.
> 
> 
>>Use case #3
>>
>>I am not sure which feature this use cases puts forward, to be honest.
>>Also: the reference to XHTML2 seems to be besides to point for the use
>>case, and would just add mud to the water:-) (In my view at least.)
> 
> 
> I took out the reference to XHTML2, as I agree that it's not the main
> point here. However, I'd like to keep this use case as it's an important
> one for the publishing community (Bob DuCharme and, previously, IPTC.)
> 
> 
>>Use case #4
>>
>>Last sentence: do we want that? We have *not* added such specific,
>>technical requirements in the previous use cases. I wonder whether we
>>should do it here...
> 
> 
> Yes, I think we do want it. It's important to point out that RDFa should
> play nicely with existing HTML.
> 
> 
>>Use case #6
>>
>>I think the reference is wrong and the text should refer to Use Case #5
>>(furnishing information...).
> 
> 
> Indeed! Fixed.
> 
> 
>>Use case #7
>>
>>We should somehow emphasize that Patrick uses, for his annotation, large
>>ontologies that the medical domain has developed over the years (maybe
>>we could even pick two of those)
> 
> 
> I've added wording to this effect and a reference to UNIPROT. I'm also
> waiting for some feedback from Science Commons to beef up this use case.
> 
> -Ben
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:21:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:27 GMT