Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!

On Feb 20, 2007, at 6:20 AM, Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> Welcome back to work to our US comrades!
>
> Looking at Tom Morris presentation at BarCamp London 2 [1]
> raises the question, why - still - RDFa is denounced to be XHTML 2-only
> :(
>
> I would like to trigger a 'RDFa PR campaign' to inform SW developers
> that RDFa is available with XHTML 1.1, already.

Really? Do you have an example? What's the path from such
a document to the RDFa spec? Which MIME type does it
use? Which namespaces? I haven't seen any update to
the XHTML namespace document to refer to RDFa specs.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/