W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: [RDFa] XHTML 2.0 only? NO!

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:17:30 -0600
Message-Id: <e513d0f88e4ecffea1156c8892d19227@w3.org>
Cc: <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>

On Feb 20, 2007, at 6:20 AM, Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
> Welcome back to work to our US comrades!
>
> Looking at Tom Morris presentation at BarCamp London 2 [1]
> raises the question, why - still - RDFa is denounced to be XHTML 2-only
> :(
>
> I would like to trigger a 'RDFa PR campaign' to inform SW developers
> that RDFa is available with XHTML 1.1, already.

Really? Do you have an example? What's the path from such
a document to the RDFa spec? Which MIME type does it
use? Which namespaces? I haven't seen any update to
the XHTML namespace document to refer to RDFa specs.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 15:17:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:28 GMT