Ben Adida wrote: > Hausenblas, Michael wrote: >> Looking at Tom Morris presentation at BarCamp London 2 [1] >> raises the question, why - still - RDFa is denounced to be XHTML 2-only >> :( Yes, I still hear this as well (I include a slide about RDFa in each presentation I give). > > This isn't surprising, people think extra attributes means XHTML2 only. > There's a bright side to this, though: he likes the RDFa syntax and he > says "if you don't care about validation...." which is exactly right > until we have an XHTML 1.1 module validator. > >> I would like to trigger a 'RDFa PR campaign' to inform SW developers >> that RDFa is available with XHTML 1.1, already. > > A very good point, but I would suggest holding off a bit until we have > the next version of the Primer and at least an updated (if not > published) version of the syntax. So, mid-March or so. OK, but by mid March we should really start a publicity campaign. Guus > > -Ben > -- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 14:37:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:28 GMT