W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2007

[SKOS] Editing SKOS issues

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:48:03 +0100
Message-ID: <45C670B3.7090105@few.vu.nl>
To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

Hi,

As Guus pointed, there is no use keeping confidential a mail I wrote 
with question about the edition process for SKOS issues, trying to make 
things clearer. Perhaps we can discuss that during next teleconf...

Following our teleconf yesterday, this mail tries to clarify the 
situation about who does what for the issue list(s):
1. Alistair is the official editor on 
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables
2. Jon has to decide on whether the wiki shall be used for issues (empty 
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssues) or if we use the tracker.
3. To guide our early discussion I have put (and updated) on 
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosIssuesSandbox a list of current 
issues that is unedited (the only interests being that (i) it's a list 
of our current issues and (ii) they are linked to the requirements)

Some synchronization has therefore to be done. Honnestly I'll be glad to 
let Jon and Alistair deal with further editing of the issue list. As 
long as their plans involve keeping the links between the issues and the 
requirements, which I think are really necessary, I'm happy!
So gentlemen, I'll let you decide. But I think that it is better if for 
the issue edition we have only one person in charge. It's not a big 
problem, synchronization can always be difficult, and it is highly 
possible that some of us will also have to deal soon with other tasks, 
e.g. SKOS test cases...

Cheers,

Antoine
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2007 23:48:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:28 GMT