At 05:01 PM 9/28/2006 -0400, Pete Haglich wrote: >A quick question, as an ontology developer: Will these namespaces >actually dereference to OWL files? yes, and the final namespaces (sorry for all the intermediate versions) became: http://www.w3.org/2006/time# http://www.w3.org/2006/time-entry# http://www.w3.org/2006/timezone# http://www.w3.org/2006/time-us# http://www.w3.org/2006/time-world# These really should be explicit in some future version of the WD. > Tools like Protege work better if >one can reach out and touch an OWL file. of course :) And the documents at these namespace names are all served as Content-Type: application/rdf+xml per the RDF Recommendation. (and unfortunately most deployed browsers still don't do anything clever out-of-the-box with that content type.) The new Semantic Web Deployment Working Group has an opportunity to cite these namespaces in its work on Vocabulary Management.Received on Friday, 29 September 2006 16:52:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:22 GMT