Re: [WNET] explicit consent to publish WordNet WD

Hi Jacco,

Thanks for you consent. The publication was accepted conditionally: only 
if the URIs work. As we speak Ralph Swick is working on computing the 
CBD's and putting them in W3C space.

Cheers,
Mark.

Jacco van Ossenbruggen wrote:
> Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> [NEW] ACTION: Guus get Jacco to mail explicit consent to publish
>> WordNet WD [recorded in
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/05/08-swbp-minutes.html#action14]
> Guus, I already gave explicit consent in the 24 April teleconf, see
> http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#item06.
> 
> But I'd be happy to repeat that: please go ahead with publishing this as
> a WD.
> 
> Jacco
> 
> PS: I missed the discussion on the recipes, but I noticed that the
> example URIs given still resolve in a 404 error, try for example:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/synset-bank-noun-1
> 
> Is this going to be resolved before publication?  If not, the draft
> should make a disclaimer  for sentences such as "WordNet can also be
> queried on line by performing HTTP GETs on the URIs described below." 
> 
> But this is not a show stopper for me.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark