Guus Schreiber wrote: > [NEW] ACTION: Guus get Jacco to mail explicit consent to publish > WordNet WD [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2006/05/08-swbp-minutes.html#action14] Guus, I already gave explicit consent in the 24 April teleconf, see http://www.w3.org/2006/04/24-swbp-minutes.html#item06. But I'd be happy to repeat that: please go ahead with publishing this as a WD. Jacco PS: I missed the discussion on the recipes, but I noticed that the example URIs given still resolve in a 404 error, try for example: http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/synset-bank-noun-1 Is this going to be resolved before publication? If not, the draft should make a disclaimer for sentences such as "WordNet can also be queried on line by performing HTTP GETs on the URIs described below." But this is not a show stopper for me.Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 09:07:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:21 GMT