Re: [MM/WN] revised semantic web example using WordNet

Hi Jacco,


> Mark, I've used dc:subject to refer to two wordnet concepts:
> 
> <dc:subject
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/synset-Indian_elephant-noun-1"/>
> <dc:subject
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/synset-Ganesh-noun-1"/>
> 
> Have I used the right URIs?  Other comments?

Hi Jacco, below are the relevant RDF statements; as I announced earlier 
the data files are online at [2].

Other comments on [1]:
- image about the Elephant Ganesh -> image of the ...
- A good starting point for having more -> for more
- whose meaning has not -> which cannot easily be interpreted by 
automated procedures
- The ontology-based ... -> shorter sentence
- to annotate their images -> its images

Hope that's helpful,
Mark.


<wn20schema:NounSynset 
rdf:about="&wn20instances;synset-Indian_elephant-noun-1"
     rdfs:label="Indian_elephant">
   <wn20schema:synsetId>102415012</wn20schema:synsetId>
</wn20schema:NounSynset>

<wn20schema:NounSynset rdf:about="&wn20instances;synset-Ganesh-noun-1"
     rdfs:label="Ganesh">
   <wn20schema:synsetId>108924549</wn20schema:synsetId>
</wn20schema:NounSynset>



[1]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/image_annotation.html#semweb_intro
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/rdf/

-- 
  Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
        markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark