Re: [MM] 2n deliverable - EXIF progress

Yes, agreed...I had been planning on reducing the RDF quite a bit,  
replacing it with standard RDF figures, similar to the ones you  
pointed me to. Thanks again for the suggestion.

Cheers,
Chris

On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:10 PM, Uschold, Michael F wrote:

> One more thing...
>
> I don't think it is a good idea to put lots of raw RDF in the main  
> text of the document, have it in an appendix.
> In the main text, give snippets of RDF scattered through the  
> document to illustrate the main examples/points. In every case,  
> give an English explanation for what it means. The appendix can  
> have the complete picture.
>
> Have a look at some of the OEP deliverables to see what I mean.
> Try this link: http://smi-web.stanford.edu/people/noy/ 
> ClassesAsValues/ClassesAsValues-2nd-WD.html
> Look at approach 1. A figure might even help a lot, to show some of  
> the key properties.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> From: Christian Halaschek-Wiener [mailto:halasche@cs.umd.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:05 PM
> To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen; Vassilis Tzouvaras; Giorgos Stamou;  
> Raphaël Troncy; Jeff Pan
> Cc: swbp list
> Subject: [MM] 2n deliverable - EXIF progress
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been really busy lately but have made some progress on the  
> EXIF write-up for the 2nd deliverable. Its still in the works, so  
> there is much more to come. I'm having some problems getting my CVS  
> access working, so I have just included the html version here. I  
> have some questions, which I was hoping we could address tomorrow.  
> Anyway, I'll talk to you all tomorrow on the telecon.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>