Re: [MM] 2n deliverable - EXIF progress

Hi Michael,
   Thank you for the feedback. Yes, the document is in very  
preliminary shape and is still in the works. I will definitely take  
into account and address your feedback and suggestions.  Thanks again!

Cheers,
Chris


-- 
Christian Halaschek-Wiener
PhD Student, Dept. of Computer Science
GRA, MINDSWAP Research Group,
University of Maryland, College Park
Web page: http://www.mindswap.org/~chris


On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:04 PM, Uschold, Michael F wrote:

> This seems to be off to a decent start.
>
> A few thoughts:
>
> I would like to know who this note is for, what the objective of  
> this note is and a short summary outline or abstract of what is  
> going to be in it.
>
> For example you might want to have some of this:
>
> GOALS:
> * to explain the benefits of representing and processing EXIF data  
> using semantic web languages
> * to explain the current state of the art and practice regarding  
> use of EXIF data on the semantic web
> * to make it possible for a reader to build a semantic web  
> application using EXIF data
> * ???
>
> INTENDED AUDIENCE
> * people who wish to implement systems using EXIF data on semantic  
> web applications
> * programmers?
> * managers?
> * technical people? How technical?
> * owners of image libraries?
> * etc etc etc
>
> CONTENT OUTLINE:
> * motivation: why bother converting EXIF to RDF/OWL?  Include here,  
> a list of stakeholders, who cares and what benefits will there be?
> * describe the over all desired approach, e.g. you have a RDF or  
> OWL representation of EXIF data, you have translators that go back  
> and forth, you have reasoners that work on the EXIF/RDF data, you  
> show maybe an architecture of a generic semantic web application  
> that will make use of EXIF/RDF.
> * Two examples of RDF conversions of EXIF data. Indicate which  
> parts of the above desired scenario are currently being addressed
> * Comparative analysis: what are pros/cons of the two approaches?  
> Can they work together? Are the differences important in any way?  
> What remains to be done?
> * Summary and conclusions and future work.
>
>
> From: Christian Halaschek-Wiener [mailto:halasche@cs.umd.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 7:05 PM
> To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen; Vassilis Tzouvaras; Giorgos Stamou;  
> Raphaël Troncy; Jeff Pan
> Cc: swbp list
> Subject: [MM] 2n deliverable - EXIF progress
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been really busy lately but have made some progress on the  
> EXIF write-up for the 2nd deliverable. Its still in the works, so  
> there is much more to come. I'm having some problems getting my CVS  
> access working, so I have just included the html version here. I  
> have some questions, which I was hoping we could address tomorrow.  
> Anyway, I'll talk to you all tomorrow on the telecon.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>