Hi all, Per my action item [1], and as input for tomorrow's MMTF teleconf, this is my personal list of standards I believe should not be included in the discussion of the interoperability draft (note this is the MMTF's 2nd deliverable, not the image annotation draft we have voted on yesterday). Instead, I propose to have an informal appendix that lists these standards with a short explanation why we have decided to leave them out. Jacco [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/01/26-MMTF-minutes.html#action18 -- IN SCOPE: MPEG7, VRA, IPTC Core and related standards, Getty Vocabularies, EXIF, CIDOC-CRM, MIME, WAI WCAG 2.0 , CC/PP OUT OF SCOPE: - Dublin Core: There is an official RDF syntax, and interoperability between non-RDF and RDF serializations of DC are not a MM-specific problem. - TV-Anytime: This is a good standard to include in future work, but for now it is out of scope for a draft that is focused on images only - EBU metadata: idem - SMPTE: idem - FOAF: not MM specific, no compatibility problems between RDF and non-RDF representations -Media Streams: Licensing problems, not publicly available, not used outside its original local (research) context - PREMO: dead standard -OAI-MPH: No MM-specifics here NOT SURE - MPEG-21: Maybe a bit too early? Standard not finished yet. - UNIMARC, AMICO & IMS: I do not know this well enough to have an opinion - Modality Theory-based vocabularies: feels like future work (XG?)Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2006 10:24:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:20 GMT