RE: [ALL] RDF/A Primer Version

> From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] 
> 
> On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 13:02 -0500, Ben Adida wrote:
> > Continuing on this point, I guess that implies the following thing:
> > 
> > If http://example.com/foo resolves to an XHTML document, 
> > then http://example.com/foo#bar can only be an information resource.
> 
> I don't believe that's the case. What suggests that it is?

I think Ben may have been a bit imprecise above.  According to my read
of the WebArch and httpRange-14 decision, if http://example.com/foo
resolves to an XHTML document, then the resource that
http://example.com/foo#bar identifies *is* a location within an HTML
document.  AFAIK this may not preclude it from *also* being a member of
some other class.  

More explanation in my reply to Jeremy:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Feb/0005.
html

David Booth