W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > August 2006

RE: Decision on publishing Time Ontology in OWL as a Working Draft

From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:51:16 -0700
Message-ID: <4301AFA5A72736428DA388B73676A381035772CA@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: "David Wood" <dwood@softwarememetics.com>
Cc: "Christopher Welty" <welty@us.ibm.com>, <chris.menzel@gmail.com>, "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>, "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, "Ralph Swick" <swick@w3.org>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

The current draft is now in very good shape. We were going try and add
another [no more than a] few pages to make it stronger, but that could
be done without, if necessary.

Deborah was hoping to get to that extra bit, but we set no timetable.

Options include:
* submit the note as is for review in the group, and try to hurry it
through in SWBPD
* submit the note as is for review in the group, but publish it under
the new SWD group.
* add the extra bit and publish it in new group.

Doing it in the new group will be a bit of an admin nuisance, but well
worth it compared to not getting the note published. 

David: what are the pros/cons of holding up the SWBPD group longer? 

Mike
 


==========================
Michael Uschold
M&CT, Phantom Works 
425 373-2845
michael.f.uschold@boeing.com  
==========================

-----Original Message-----
From: David Wood [mailto:dwood@softwarememetics.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 4:21 PM
To: Uschold, Michael F
Cc: Christopher Welty; chris.menzel@gmail.com; Deborah L. McGuinness;
Guus Schreiber; Ralph Swick; public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Decision on publishing Time Ontology in OWL as a Working
Draft

Hi Mike,

We were supposed to close the SWBPD WG months ago and are way beyond our
charter.  The plan has been to take a decision on the Time Ontology
working draft and then close the group.

Can your note be moved to the SWD WG when it stands up next month?   
Please discuss the alternatives before suggesting that we hold the SWBPD
WG open longer.  Thanks in advance.

I have copied the WG mailing list in order to have a record of this
conversation and act publicly.

Regards,
Dave


On 24 Aug2006, at 18:43, Uschold, Michael F wrote:

> By "Close SWBPD" does that mean that the Semantic interoperability 
> Note we are nearly done with needs to really hurry up?
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> ==========================
> Michael Uschold
> M&CT, Phantom Works
> 425 373-2845
> michael.f.uschold@boeing.com
> ==========================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wood [mailto:dwood@softwarememetics.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 12:19 PM
> To: ** individual members of the SWBPD WG **
> Subject: Re: Decision on publishing Time Ontology in OWL as a Working 
> Draft
>
> Hi all,
>
> PLEASE respond to the questionnaire regarding the Time Ontology 
> publication as a Working Draft so we can close SWBPD.  Thanks in 
> advance.
>
> The poll will close at 23:59, Boston time on 2006-09-05.
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35495/pub0818/
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
Received on Friday, 25 August 2006 00:52:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:47 UTC