Pat Hayes wrote: > >> Has SWBPD expressed an opinion on best practice for linking from an >> HTML document to an RDF document that describes it and/or attempts to >> provide equivalent content? > > There might be different ways for those two different relationships, > right? That is, if the RDF is about the HTML, case 1, or about the same > topic as the HTML, case 2, as in the 'vocabulary' examples recently > discussed where the GET request can choose between HTML and RDF > renderings (?) of the 'same' topic. Seems like we might want to keep > those cases distinct. Right. But if using <a> or <link> were the recommendation you could just use different values of the "rel" attribute for these cases. > >> (This seems like it ought to be a FAQ, and I must be missing >> something obvious; I've looked on the SWBPD page; have I not found >> the right reference?) >> >> "Expressing Simple Dublin Core in RDF/XML" >> <http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmes-xml/> suggests using <link >> rel="meta" href="mydoc.dcxml" />, where mydoc.dcxml is the RDF/XML >> document. But what I frequently see is a plain old link, e.g., in >> this case something like <a href="/mydoc.dcxml" >RDF</a> (or an >> equivalent button, as used at the bottom of the RDF specs). It seems >> as if some recommendations along these lines would be helpful. > > Indeed. > > Pat > >> >> --Frank > >Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 17:06:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:21 GMT