- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:47:12 +0900
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for "Image Annotation on the Semantic Web"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-image-annotation-20060322/
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:50:45 GMT
First WD
In this following paragraph, the WG tries to address an annotation
problem with the PhotoStuff Image annotator. It seems unrelated to
the title " 5.1 Use Case: Management of Personal Digital Photo
Collections" which says *personal*. How someone will be able to
install Jena, a java application, etc for annotating the photos?
[[[
Regarding the actual content of the image, various vocabularies can
be used depending on the respective thematic category. The example
shows a photo that has content from the beach holidays thematic
category. For this reason, a beach ontology and the PhotoStuff image
annotator [PhotoStuff] can be used to describe the image content.
]]]
-- Image Annotation on the Semantic Web
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-image-annotation-20060322/
#solution_personal
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:50:45 GMT
In terms of personal annotation, examples like Flickr have shown a
not perfect but workable solution for annotating images. It's why it
would be interesting to have specific reviews from people creating
these services to have their opinions about user-needs-driven
development on their softwares. I think they gain a tremendous
experience on a large scale and certainly that the assumptions we
could make.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 05:47:19 UTC