- From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:52:20 +0200
- To: SW Best Practices <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Vocabulary Management telecon, Tue, Sep 27, 1300 UTC (1500 Berlin) Zakim: +1.617.761.6200=20 Conference code 8683# ('VMTF') irc://irc.w3.org:6665/vmtf http://www.w3.org/2005/07/05-swbp-irc Dear all, As I mentioned in a posting last week, Alistair, Dan, and I recently had a chance to meet at DC-2005 in Madrid (Sep 12-15) and to discuss with Eric Miller what goals we might realistically be able to attain in Vocabulary Management within the chartered lifetime of SWBP-WG (1st February 2006). We agreed that the current draft [1], which has not advanced since before the August lull, provides a fine basis for a short, useful, and tightly focused note, but recognized that an additional push would be needed to push this to completion. We also agreed that the latest TAG decision on httpRange-14 [2], along with developments in DCMI, provide an important opportunity to agree on among SKOS, FOAF, and Dublin Core on a common approach to the simple and very basic question: What do you get when you click on the URI of a SKOS, FOAF, or DC term? DCMI has a concrete problem to solve in this regard inasmuch clicking on the URIs of a Dublin Core term currently takes users to a screenful of angle brackets at the top of the RDF schema -- try clicking on http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title. This is not very user-friendly. In Madrid, Dan, Alistair, Eric, and I informally discussed different approaches to improving on this situation -- e.g., by using content negotiation to serve up Web pages or RDF schemas as alternatives, or by pointing from a target Web page to an RDF schema. Solving this really basic problem with a common approach implemented by SKOS, FOAF, and Dublin Core would provide an excellent (and realistic) focus for a short note on the basis of the current draft and should be useful as an example for others to follow, but further discussion is needed to agree on a solution. Dan, Alistair, Ralph, and anyone else out there with an interest in this -- could we use the telecon tomorrow to keep the momentum going on this? Thanks, Tom [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/principles/20050705 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html -- Dr. Thomas Baker baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de SUB - Goettingen State +49-551-39-3883 and University Library +49-30-8109-9027 Papendiek 14, 37073 Göttingen
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 14:45:52 UTC