W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > October 2005

Re: [ALL/MM] EMMA Last call

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:12:37 +0100
Message-ID: <43413C55.9000700@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, mf@w3.org 



Off top of my head, without having looked at document:

RDF is useful when
   - data is intended for Web publication
   - or schema is open and extensible

If EMMA has a fully specified schema that does not need 
application/implementation specific extensions, and the data is 
transient and not intended for Web publication then RDF may have been 
useful but I would not see a comment along the lines of "You should have 
used RDF" as well-founded.


Jeremy
Received on Monday, 3 October 2005 14:13:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:18 GMT