W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > November 2005

Re: [VM] question about ftf review action

From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:00:06 +0100
To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Cc: Alistair Miles <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20051122100006.GA2112@Octavius>

Guus,

The document in question -- the one for which reviewers will
be needed -- is not [1], but [2].  I am preparing a longer
post to put this into perspective.

Tom

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/principles/20050705
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2005-11-18/

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:56:37PM +0100, Guus Schreiber wrote:
> From the scribe log of VM TF:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0046.html
> 
> >Guus: Two things before lunch: (i) anyone want to review the short
> >doc?
> >
> >David and Andreas agree to review it.
> 
> As far as I can recall the action above (which I missed in the draft ftf 
> minutes) was to review the following document:
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/principles/20050705
> 
> Is this the version to review or should the reviewers wait for an update?

-- 
Dr. Thomas Baker                      baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
SUB - Goettingen State                            +49-551-39-3883
and University Library                           +49-30-8109-9027
Papendiek 14, 37073 Göttingen
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 09:59:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:19 GMT