W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > November 2005

[WN] comments on draft

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:48:25 +0000
Message-ID: <437A0349.50607@hpl.hp.com>
To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org

Reviewed document:

1. the abstract is not an abstract

2. abstract/sotd or intro needs to set expectations about target
audience and contribution of this document, and its non-objectives

The TF should produce guidelines for transforming existing wordnets into
an RDF/OWL representation. Guidelines should describe strategies for
converting wordnets-like structures into an RDF representation, as well
as strategies for re-describing in RDF/OWL the content originally
conveyed in the wordnets.

3. URI issue could/should be expanded, highlighted somewhat.
  - do the terms like synset etc need a different URI from the terms in
the wordnet itself (e.g. #bank-1)
- different URIs for different versions?
- hash (one huge file) versus slash (303 response? WebArch issue)

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 15:49:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:45 UTC