W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > November 2005

RE: [VM] question about ftf review action

From: Miles, AJ \(Alistair\) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:08:42 -0000
Message-ID: <677CE4DD24B12C4B9FA138534E29FB1D0ACE62@exchange11.fed.cclrc.ac.uk>
To: "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: "SWBPD list" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Guus,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guus Schreiber [mailto:schreiber@cs.vu.nl]
> Sent: 14 November 2005 18:57
> To: Miles, AJ (Alistair); Dan Brickley
> Cc: SWBPD list
> Subject: [VM] question about ftf review action
> 
> 
> Alistair, Dan,
> 
>  From the scribe log of VM TF:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0046.html

> 
> > Guus: Two things before lunch: (i) anyone want to review the short
> > doc?
> > 
> > David and Andreas agree to review it.
> 
> As far as I can recall the action above (which I missed in 
> the draft ftf 
> minutes) was to review the following document:
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/principles/20050705

> 
> Is this the version to review or should the reviewers wait 
> for an update?

No, the action is to review the planned (as yet unwritten) note describing URI dereferencing policies for SKOS Core, FOAF and DC.  Before writing this note we intend to align the policies for these vocabs, and in preparation I have prepared the following document:

http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/


... any initial comments on this would be very helpful.

There will be a VM telecon tomorrow to discuss this, see Ralph's message:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0013.html


Cheers,

Al.
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 19:08:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:19 GMT